1. Home
Sachin Sadashiv Mane on 30 December 2011
Share on Facebook

Information about PACL limited

Dear sir I have invested rs 0000 in pacl india limited (pearls) but now I have doubt that is this company is froud company . Please guide me

View all 11 comments
Pawan

Pacl ke jaisi hi usk

compny h compny ko

market me aaye hue

10yr ho gaye h agent

bane or lakho kamaye

kyo usk pacl se 3 guna

jyada income krati h

agent ki car 950000

collection pr h or spot

commision 20% (ipp) 8

%(cdpp) milta jaldi

sampark

kre . . . . .Pawan sharma

9983499095 jai usk


Shekhar Vashist

Agar aap pacl may pasay invest karanay say dartay hai toh.Daro mat its as safe as govt organisation

mai or mari family pichhle 10 saal say pacl company may kaam kar rahay hai .Mai or maray saray custumers ise may bahut santust hai.Jankari k abhav k karan log esay galat najarea say dekhtay hai.Agar aap ko adhik jankari chahiya toh hum say sampark karay.Aur agar aap ise may kaam karna chahatay hai toh yeh bahut asaan bhi hai ese may income bhi bahut jyada hai.

Adhik jankari k lea call karay:9812068790 7206513882;7357585427


Raghu

Item no.32 court no.1 section XV

s u p r e M e C o u r t o f I n D I a

record of proceedings

I.A. Nos.16-17 in CIVIL appeal nos.6753-6754 of 2004

securities & exchange board of india appellant (s)

versus

pacl india ltd. & Ors. Respondent(s)

(for directions appln.(S) for permission to file additional

affidavit and office report)

date: 06/02/2012 these matters were called on for hearing today.

Coram :

hon'ble the chief justice

hon'ble mr. Justice a.K. Patnaik

hon'ble mr. Justice swatanter kumar

for appellant(s) mr. Gaurab banerji asg.

Ms. Suruchii aggarwal adv.

For respondent(s) mr. T.R. Andhyarujina sr.Adv.

Mr. Shyam divan sr.Adv.

Mr. Vinay bhasin sr.Adv.

Mr. Rohit tandon adv.

Mr. Vikram batra adv.

Mr. Hari shankar k adv.

Mr. Mohan jain asg.

Mr. D.K. Thakur adv.

Ms. Sheethal menon adv.

Mr. B.K. Prasad adv.

Mr. B.V. Balaram das adv.

Mr. S. Balakrishnan sr.Adv.

Mr. Pavan kumar adv.

Upon hearing counsel the court made the following

o r D e r

place the CIVIL appeals for final hearing

as second item I.E. After s.L.P. (C) nos.29282-

29284 of 2008.

T.I. Rajput madhu saxena

a.R.-Cum-p.S. Assistant registrar

sir is there any order for favor of the company from the apex court to continue their business till the final order.


Raghu Nadhan

Real estate firm office raided

A team of Crime Branch sleuths have sealed the office of Pearls India Limited (PACL) a real estate development firm here after a day-long raid on its premises in connection with a case registered under the Money Chain Act by the Thalassery police in 2011.

According to sources a team led by Superintendent of Police (Economic Offence Wing) P.A. Valsan raided the office from 11 a.m. to 6 p.m. Documents relating to nearly Rs.33 crore collected from around 20 183 customers from the district were seized a Crime Branch official said.

The PACL offices in Kozhikode and Thrissur were raided by the Crime Branch on December 1 and 2 respectively. Both offices were sealed and documents showing clash transactions to the tune of Rs.267 crore seized from Kozhikode and of Rs.592 crore from Thrissur.

‘‘We are in the process of ascertaining whether they have been issued licence to collect money from people. They collected money under the guise of offering land in major cities in States including Madhya Pradesh Rajasthan and Andhra Pradesh as per a cash-down payment plan and an instalment payment plan ’’ the official added. But the customers have not been provided with land against the payment he said.

A case was registered by the Thalassery police when agents of PACL collected huge amounts of money from a number of people at Sarada Krishna Aiyar Auditorium in the town in 2011.


Raghu Nadhan

Why there is a series of crime branch raids.Recently KOLLAM OFFICE KERALA has been raided by crime branch KERALA and suspended all the activities of the company in KERALA. Can you say the real reason behind all the raids. A simple answer that the company is genuine only will not serve the query. Is it because of the case in in the supreme court? What will be future of the company if the apex court turn against the company like in the case of SAHARA?


Raghu Nadhan

ITEM NO.101-PH COURT NO.6 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 6753-6754 OF 2004 SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA Appellant (s) VERSUS PACL INDIA LTD. & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for directions and permission to place addl. documents on record and impleadment and early hearing and permission to file additional affidavit and with office report) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.2864/2006 (With appln.(s) for stay and office report) Date: 26/02/2013 These Appeals were called on for hearing today. CIVIL APPEAL NO.2864/2006- dismissed CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 6753-6754/2004- allowed.

PL.SEE THIS.

Can any of the company officers explain it in detail.